Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
708-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

708-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012426 50.866754)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012383 50.866749,-1.012385 50.866757,-1.012391 50.866765,-1.012400 50.866771,-1.012412 50.866775,-1.012425 50.866776,-1.012438 50.866775,-1.012460 50.866766,-1.012466 50.866758,-1.012468 50.866750,-1.012466 50.866741,-1.012461 50.866734,-1.012451 50.866728,-1.012439 50.866724,-1.012426 50.866722,-1.012401 50.866727,-1.012392 50.866733,-1.012385 50.866741,-1.012383 50.866749)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL